I'm keeping an eye on IsLaudaStillOnDT.tk if this Flag happens.
I still need to figure out how to serve different domain names from one VPS, so unfortunately this one is temporarily out of order.
You can however view
Trust settings as DT to see that Lauda currently has 5 Trust inclusions left.
My isLaudastillonDT.log was last updated on December 20, 15:10h (Amsterdam time), at which moment it showed this:
YES! Lauda is on DT2 with 11 inclusions.
So the recent "Lauda topics" took away 6 inclusions.
It's possible even LoyceV thinks someone is getting out of hand here, but Switzerland and all, and I don't want to directly speak for this person either..
Switzerland is broken, but indeed, Trust has been getting out of hand for quite a while. Feedback from DT used to mean something, but nowadays anyone can be on DT and anyone can be tagged for anything.
I've partially read the topics recent on Lauda, but the number of topics is getting out of hand too, and apart from working on getting loyce.club back online, it's also Christmas time and if I do respond, I want it to based on complete information (this post doesn't count, as I haven't read everything yet). However, I'm thinking of creating a slightly related Meta-topic. Update: see
Trust Feature idea: give DT1 the ability to remove specific feedbacks from DT.
I've spent quite a lot of time describing
what I consider correct use of the Trust system, and judging by the 10 translations on local boards, many users agree.
I strongly believe in this:
These are mere guidelines
Trust isn't moderated, but how you use it is your "business card" to the community. Use the above as guidelines only. It's meant to give you a general idea of what I consider good behaviour. It's also wise to ask yourself before leaving feedback: "Does my feedback make Bitcointalk a better place? And if it's negative: is it worth destroying someone's account and reputation over this?". Consider using Neutral feedback if neither Positive nor Negative is justified.
The tale of the "virtue signaler"
As a non-native English speaker, I have no idea what it means, and "
a pejorative neologism for the conspicuous expression of moral values." just adds more words I don't know.