OK I'll stop..
Hahahaahahha
No wonder you receive red trust. hahahahahha
Do really believe that you are representing the ideas of my post fairly? Of course, I have a tendency to ramble a bit with explanations and even stream of consciousness, sometimes, but your summary is truly quite a bit less than genuine, amiNOTrite?
Ultimately, you can do whatever you want in terms of your posting behavior(s) or pestering anyone (including me) on any given topic, because I don't easily get flustered, even when members seem to be attempting to purposefully misrepresent the gist of my earlier points... like you seem to have just done. Go figure?
I think I was right about your rambling, if you like walls of text go enjoy with TOAA.
We have already gone back and forth a few times... TOAA and me.
You are not just a spectator here as you are claming in every post of yours, you are a part of the problem because of this !!!
You are free to make whatever determination that you deem appropriate, and I will let my words speak for themselves in terms of whatever I was purportedly claiming in terms of my spectatorship perspective or not.
Eddie13 is talking 100% genuine and on topic, it is you who deny to take responsibility with literally no reason than fear to loose your "[blank 2]".
Yeah.. right... .. You seem to just want to stir shit, and attempt to go over points that have already been covered.
Or just say, you would include someone in your trust list even if they are an harm to the system.
I am not trusting anyone that I consider to be a harm to the system - although in my earlier post, I mentioned that I was considering making some adjustments, but at this time, I have no intention to discuss my trust considerations in public threads nor in response to any kind of assertion that I am somehow not doing it right.... I think that I already largely and sufficiently addressed this whole point at least once and maybe even more than once... and perhaps even more than I had needed to explain....