Now please stay on topic here, pull up all your personal attacks somewhere else. You are looking pretty bad.
I would also appreciate that members stay on topic here, especially high-ranking ones who should know better to be honest.
This has nothing to do with the topic or the rating he received. If you want to scrutinize the target of abuse until you feel you have reached a point of false equivalence start your own topic on the matter if it is so critically important.
To be clear: the legitimacy of any accusations against hacker1001101001 are irrelevant
here, as it's maliciously off-topic, hence distracts from the topic. If anything, the legitimacy of these claims have been reduced considerably by default, due to the unconventional and controversial manner in which they were raised. I hope that other members reading this can see the obvious
deflection tactics being used.
To return to the topic, this is the sort of person and mentality that is being discussed at the moment, yet again:
I have to say, leaving negative feedback for sending a single merit for something a person likes is a bit much not? Lauda?
Like it involved some very good members and stuff.... I also wouldn't appreciate some negative trust for just a difference in opinion ...
I would go up to
flag ban them, but since liberals make the flag-rules here this is the compromise solution for liars.
As a reminder, this user does not care about the opinions, concerns or recommendations of others, despite being
trusted by many DT1 members:
Just ~Lauda and fuck off if you don't agree with it.
This obviously reflects badly upon those who trust this user's judgement, as opposed to the user in question, who openly doesn't care:
If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer.
Lauda isn't the problem here.