Thank you AnonymousCoder & Traxo for your timely replies.


If Armstrong could at least be prepared to discuss his previous calls during the WEC's I wouldn't mind so much because knowing where you went wrong in a trade is just as important as knowing why you were right!  Secondly, humility is a very important asset when dealing with a large group of people who are eager to learn & by not being accountable for his calls, he makes the same mistake as the politicians to which he blames in all of his writings. 

Each WEC should at least start off from the previous WEC to show continuity & to address those areas which had either proven to be correct or incorrect.  At least then the audience would be given a fair & open assessment of what to expect for their $2,500. 

It should also be noted that Mr Armstrong did not graduate in Economics from University & thus is not technically an Economist so surely the team at AE would be even more keen to prove their abilities at predicting the future by going over the number of correct/incorrect calls from the previous WEC?

This is my sticking point with Armstrong & the answer is clearly one of two things:  a) They have the worst PR department in the history of any business or b)  He is a indeed a fake.....



I take no pleasure in writing this last statement & of course I am open to criticism but I have also taught higher degree level learning at University & I am well aware of what it takes to deliver material to eager students & be able to discuss events after the fact.