Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump?

Quote from: marlboroza on January 02, 2020, 03:25:16 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 02, 2020, 11:53:19 AM

Nailed it. I was wondering about the resemblance, but I couldn't put a username to it. Please not that guy again. Undecided

Eh, I only said that he sounds like mday, nothing else. Btw, Lauda, since you are here and google just showed me something, I don't see you have addressed this:

You misunderstood me. I meant to say that it sounded like mday to me as well, but I couldn't remember the username that I had in mind! Obviously I have no evidence to support this connection.

Quote from: marlboroza on January 02, 2020, 03:25:16 PM

-snip-
There must be perfectly valid explanation why this address has ~20% transactions to and/or from this group of payed ICO bumping shills...

Let me guess:

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on January 02, 2020, 10:14:52 AM

You could round me up to anything scam realted which I am nowhere involved in and didn't even cause any financial damages to any real victims and use the trust system as you see fit.

I'll take a wild guess[1] on why the wording is real victims: People rushing into ICOs aren't really victims. "They got what they deserved", maybe that's his twisted view of reality which I have observed over the years in shady crypto groups.

Note: Still haven't set a flag precedent for ICO-bumping, but that is worse than account trading (where no known direct scam has yet occurred), thus it should be trivial.

[1] What are "fake victims" in the context of actual financial damage (and not somebody pretending to be a victim)?