@JollyGood, I think it is not appropriate use of red trust to tag campaign participants. I agree it looks very shay for someone on DT1 to promote an exchange with an infinite number of complaints never solved. I even understand your intentions which is unabling the signature promotion around. But still it is not a decent reason to tag someone with red trust as an more larger group of users are already engaged in similar signature promotion. Let alone administration handle it as theymos did it last time by banning all the signatures, that could be the best way possible.
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
still hundreds of members of the "scammer" You are in the faith. Prohibit it!
I don't understand, do not yobit other signatories to me? They've come and they are two insults.
why do you insult yourself? who are these people, able to insult you (and me).
Can't a legal exchange be promoted?
a man calls hundreds of people "scammers" and gets applause. "scammers people" are not responding. "holy corleone family" has established authority in the forum. There is such a shitty situation.