Isn't it strange that scammer CSW is listed in that article (I constrained myself from clicking on any video
linked in the article involving that fucktwat), as if he had anything to do with bitcoin, beyond attempting to mislead, deceive and scam innocent peeps? So to me it seems that any link or reference to him would also have a misleading, deceiving and scamming impact, no?
TLDR: Idea of bitcoin 11 year b-day completely valid... Idea that fucktwat scamster knows anything about it besides reading about it misleading, deceptive and scammy at best.
Can we cite a better article regarding king daddy's 11 year old b-day... wouldn't any of us have liked to have been a "king daddy" at only 11?

Yeah, my mistake. i should have add "alert message" i tried to find another piece when v8 pointed out but not much success, end up with War+anniversary+pump type of articles.
Btw i didn't notice any toxic or misleading stuff in existing piece (except hypocrisy pattern if you would like to call it). please feel free to correct me if there is any misleading drama, i might learn something out of it.