3) something which looks like "payed to bump ICO" : I agreed to be involved in such posting but left when I got to knew it's forbidden here.
Minimum 10 constructive posts per week (twitter and Facebook reports doesn't count). Regular posts in the alternate cryptocurrencies section are desired.
Imagine how a newbie would see those rules, which I changed acting on later and started posting more in other sections like Speculation, Speculation (Altcoins), Altcoin Discussion, Economics and Bitcoin Discussion you can see as you have already scanned through my post history. But this was only when I get to knew slowly about the rules. I am very clear here about my intentions back then and now so that everyone could judge the change. I have agreed being naive but proved not being the same now.
Were you payed specifically, unrelated to the signature campaign, to bump post specific ICOs?
Were you only posting in ICO threads to satisfy your sig campaign, or were you also being paid separately for any other specific targeted posting such as thread bumping?