If he had responded to your post with factual evidence justifying how and why those merits and trusts were received and given, we all would have seen the post. We all could have made an opinion about it but the evidence you have captured speaks volumes about what the OP is actually doing and how can any member simply accept it without pointing it out to him?
I was looking forward to read his reasoning why he included those people indeed. I got off-topic posts instead:
I've deleted wolwoo's
off-topic posts. This topic isn't meant to just post a Trust list. Wolwoo is welcome to post again if he can add his reasons for the exclusions:
Share yours
I encourage everyone to keep track of the reasons behind their own exclusions too.
I don't think it's helpful to create many topics on this, feel free to use 1 post here for yours (including reasons), and I'll link it from the next post.
I can't wait to see "retaliation" as a reason instead of valid thoughtful reasons that are worthy of being on DT.
As a bonus, he did prove me right that he bases his Trust on retaliation.
LOL at prove.
As usual most of your logic is completely BROKEN and low functioning.
1. I agree those promoting or enabling the advertising of scams knowingle- once made aware ( 1 warning to remove) should be red tagged if they fail to remove the sig. I class yobit as a high risk bordering on scam site. HOWEVER this must go for ALL members I see some DT wearing that same sig with NO RED TAGS. So if this is NOT universally imposed then that can not be a rule that should be enforced. Sure you will argue some will slip through the net, but even when you present this evidence if they are DT they are ALLOWED to continue unpunished. Like in the case of account selling with nutildah but people still flag up people for putting their accounts up for sale. Bogus and therefore can NOT be imposed as a universal rule. Until it is then people have the right to say fuck off to double standards. IF double standards are pushed on them THAT IS UNTRUSTWORTHY AND SCAMMING in most cases. You either believe something is WRONG or it is NOT WRONG. That does not depend on who does it.
2. Your point about retaliation is NULL and void if you are doing NOTHING wrong. If someone excludes you or red tags you when you are doing nothing wrong then they are certainly showing at a minimum POOR judgement and perhaps scamming people with double standards and taking these actions for personal gain which is clearly untrustworthy. This NO RETALIATION argument is bogus. Sure if you are busted doing something clearly WRONG that is universally punished here as a clear consistent rule then to respond or attack in return is wrong because those tagging or excluding you are NOT untrustworthy they are enforcing a universal rule. If someone punishes you WRONGLY or is imposing double standards you MUST RESPOND to warn the community. LOL at no retaliation.
3. I mean asking ANYONE why they MAY decided to NOT include a bunch of people with documented and undeniable instances of clear financially motivated wrong doing is just hilarious. Asking him that as if it was a strange move just further makes you look foolish. I mean did you mean to write why would anyone NOT exclude a bunch of people that are undeniable scammer or scammer supporters.Well done wolwoo that exclusions list looks almost 100% SPOT ON.
I feel people are again using selective enforcement against the initial poster, I feel loyce looks the other way for scammers and his other shady pals that cycle merit and trust and all include each other on DT then while trying to sound neutral scuppers and cries out if anyone tries to mount any challenge against them.
ROBOVAC is spamming away his chipmixer sig, praising tmans swearing and tourettes crap as poetry then crying if others are rude of they are trolls if they dare alter the persons nick name (although those same people do it to others constantly). He loves double standards and pretending to take the high moral ground and be neutral. Fucker is a sniping sneaky dangerous little shit.
I think the initial poster is being discriminated against clearly. Get red tagging EVERY member pushing this sig, and start scrutinizing EVERY members trust exclusions, inclusions , merit cycling to PALS the same and we can retract this.
I think he actual means the forums sense of fair play and sense of free speech is dead. To those that want to get on and aim for legendary and sigs and trading this is undeniably TRUE. You will be only getting there if you toe the controllers line and support them.
Merit cancer killed this forum. Basing trust upon it was insanity. The inital poster simply does not explain himself clearly enough sometimes but his core points have undeniable value.
There is truth in the initial posters post history. He needs to simply improve his ability to express his thoughts and keep emotion out of it as much as possible. Of course when you are being discriminated against and double standards pushed on you and punished by those that are far more dirty this is HARD.
Don't give up initial poster we salute those that will not be taken down quietly keep on fighting back. Those with backbone are in very short supply here.
Bitcointalk.org will never die, but the environment here has change a lot for the WORSE over the last 8 years for sure. It is still going down hill in terms of free speech and fair opportunities for all. Transparency and objectivity needs to replace this subjective back room collusion laden mess.
You can not dispel truth and observable instances of wrong doing because they are presented in an aggressive tone?? that is moronic. WRONG DOING IS WRONG DOING. Double standards is double standards.
You can fix your shit though as yet you are not a confirmed scammer or willing scam facilitator for pals or out of fear. DO the right thing IN ALL CASES.