We are lucky that he is sharing some of his knowledge publicly
As I already said, that just makes him a content curator.
What is even more ironic, you think that someone believes your spewing of bs and hatred.
I quoted everything. People can read
There is no need to "believe" like you "believe" in omniscient Socrates.Yet you guys are trying to discredit direct black-and-white quotes, lol.
Again, if there is something specific you want to refute, you are welcome to do it and be coherent. Stop polluting thread with nonsense.
Let's recap:
I proved Marty was wrong about gold for years:
https://busy.org/@traxo/martin-armstrong-gold-bear
I explained how he has workarounds so that he's most of the time not-even-wrong:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53486329#msg53486329
I proved that he was wrong about 2016 USA presidental elections, yet he brainwashed you into thinking he was correct:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53486641#msg53486641
I quoted what Martin claimed Socrates computer is, and asserted that whoever believes in that nonsense is his cult member:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53471994#msg53471994
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53477479#msg53477479
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53479047#msg53479047
And explained his deception about his computer providing 100% accurate predictions:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53508888#msg53508888
Then I joked about his Amazon book sell-out, but it's possible that I'm underestimating the size of his cult:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53511446#msg53511446
I provided quotes for each of my claims. Anyone is welcome to refute it if they can.