Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
AnonymousCoder
on 04/01/2020, 00:41:20 UTC
Traxo, there is a problem. You desperately trying to spin that I believe in omniscient Socrates, yet I never claim such thing. Furthermore, I even stay away to comment on it, as I don't have much experience with it.
What is your problem with MA, idk, and I don't care. If it makes you happy to spew bs and hatred on MA, it's your choice. I'll go after the knowledge and understanding, which MA is willing to share.

We do only facts here not "bs" (BULLSHIT) as you say.

What you call "knowledge" may not belong to Martin Armstrong. It is content aggregation, plagiarism and pure scientific fraud.

Proof:

The Myth of the Martin Armstrong Global Cooling Prediction.

It may not be what you are looking at. But Global Cooling is currently one of his biggest if not the biggest current campaign, and we do not need to debunk all of his campaigns past and present to make  a case. It is the way that Martin Armstrong deals with information which is the same across the board.

You call this knowledge. Quite naiive. We call this fraud.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.