You are rambling on about one single 6 year old rating.
https://i.imgur.com/I6M24hd.pngA day before TECSHARE was tagged by account koshgel:
https://i.imgur.com/k7xyUUk.pngTecshare probably thought that retaliation feedback is not good, but who gives a fuck anyway when you can apply this strategy:
"this Stalinist "show me the man I will find you the crime" bullshit must be stopped at all costs" - TECSHARE
"Yes, lets just pretend this isn't about using the trust system as a tool of retribution and selective enforcement. You know what Stalin always said, find me the man I will show you the crime." - TECSHARE
I like how you try to repurpose the term "shotgunning" to mean anything other than sheer volume of negative ratings. Last I checked I have an average of 2 negative ratings left per year. Not quote "shotgunning" or "wide net".
I see, so it is ok for you to tag 1 account seller but if someone tag ("shotgun") 50 account sellers then it is not OK. But this sounds like this then:
"Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated?" - TECSHARE
"Yes, lets just pretend this isn't about using the trust system as a tool of retribution and selective enforcement." - TECSHARE
If that is all for now...
You are the one who started this, not me, look:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.0
Now, @TECSHARE, if you don't mind:
FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this.
Point me accounts which are shilling for X10 and I will tag them.
You see how this kind of stuff just fuels itself? Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated? Well then I will just start getting more excessive to make it more equally abusive! Funny the campaign managers share no responsibility here but random users picked out of retribution or arbitrarily tagged, that will change things!
I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam
Would you like more or less scams here?
Sorry, I mean one rating over the last year. Much more impressive. Funny how these deep dives you are so fond of come along side your accusations of selective enforcement. Classic
tactics. I am curious what wonders your own ratings would hold over the last year. Who has the time to dig through so much spam of the trust system? Yep, that one rating that is potentially objectionable over a year, THAT is the true crime!
