Nice catch! Plagiarism is common among blockchain projects but they should have at least use their own words and not copy word for word. Re-phrase some statements would be nice. Because let's admit it, most of them are just copy of copy of something, and very few start from scratch. Maybe, the team should revise their project description and publish a new one.
Thing is, if they are so lazy that they couldn't even write basic explanation of their project using their own words, imagine how lazy, incompetent and dishonest they are with everything else regarding this.
Point of these shitcoins is to share tokens, find some equally shitty exchange and try to dump a bit on naive/uninformed buyers. Just a quick cash grab attempt, nothing else.
The initiative and the idea is great, but the project ended up dead like most. Hence we are using the same idea but will execute it better. If there was any better way to describe it we would have done it.
Hope this awnsers your question.