It's only one rating. It's only one farmed inclusion. It's only one scammer.
It's only one hacked account in trust network. It's only one banned account in trust network. It's only one scum selfvouching tipster in trust network. "So what's your point?" 
@TECSHARE, it is not that I quoted posts 4 times already and you quoted it 3 times and yet you missed it, if something is not understandable in my question, I will maybe hire professional translator to translate it to English, but I think it is understandable. If you don't mind to reply:
Quote from: cryptohunter https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214462.msg53514059#msg53514059
FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this.
Quote from: me
Point me accounts which are shilling for X10 and I will tag them.
Quote from: you
You see how this kind of stuff just fuels itself? Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated? Well then I will just start getting more excessive to make it more equally abusive! Funny the campaign managers share no responsibility here but random users picked out of retribution or arbitrarily tagged, that will change things!
Quote from: me
I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam
Would you like more or less scams here?
Would you like more or less scams here?