You clearly didn't read my previous post (see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215128.msg53533796#msg53533796), and my position is absolutely not what you are insinuating.

Being able to sign a message is not proof on its own, but is the first step in being able to establish something approaching proof. CSW has failed repeatedly and hilariously to do this, even going so far as trying to fake signatures. All his other "evidence" is obviously false and easily debunked.

Sure, real evidence of someone being Satoshi will be difficult to establish, but it is absolutely, categorically, none of the "evidence" CSW has presented.