If this post was the reference for the flag I probably wouldn't oppose it. I still dislike creating a flag first and coming up with evidence later.
Flag came after investigations https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215242.msg53552254#msg53552254. Evidence is mostly in morvilz7z's post (Only thing m didn't mention(or I missed it) are bunch of newbie accounts in loan threads). Please take a look:Account coin-desk -> trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2507716 -> reference to account raffie35 -> trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2500042 -> reference to accounts "Rafie35/Rifat/Lafaka" -> trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1138127 -> reference to some other accounts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg22334499#msg22334499 / untrusted feedback -> reference to loan thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5090579.msg48973938#msg48973938 -> just post under it is Devid (it is in screenshot of my first post in thread which OP mentioned) and so on...
If things mentioned in that other thread are not already enough:
Getting warmer. 
It should be in topic. I completely forgot. Withdrawing support now. Thread should be updated for flag.
Such useless link. They do not prove anything.