Sincerely,
Grammar Nanny.
Grammar Nanny.
Do you seriously have nothing else to do?
Sock #2744930 is quite the hypocrite:
(Activity: 1, user page)
Have you actually taken yhe time to reading the fucking thread? Either of you?
Please tell us your real opinion of them. Dont be shy! Its ok; we wont hurt your feelings.
...but one thing really needs to be fixed is the topic title :-P
That is why I ignored this thread at first. Poor grammar, spelling, usage and style together make a good heuristic: Avoid wasting time in 99% of cases; miss an interesting thread in 1% of cases.
I was once checking the topics in CryptoTalk.org forum and noticed they are full with this kind of poor topic titles and it seems they do not care much there which is fine considering their standard.
Their massive ad campaign seems calculated to attract shitposters. It thus successfully deterred me from wasting my time with the site. Was it founded by #MeritBrokeMyLife types,* whose whine threads so oft bluster that theymos broke the forum? I enjoy it when they threaten to take their precious shitposts elsewhere. ❄
(* Thanks to cabalism13 for the hashtag based on these notorious histrionics.)
It was briefly entitled "Paranormal Invesetigations" also?
Quite fitting but still spelled wrong..
Quite fitting but still spelled wrong..
Wrongly. Adverbs modify verbs, unless you are a fruity control-freak phone company.
That was my typographical error, now bugfixed. I know the proper speling of the word investigatoins!
Did The-Devil cast a curse on me, a spell for bad spelling? No, no, I blame Laura! The PROOF is that she promptly baked my error into a reply I cannot fix.
...and thus, I just realized that for reasons unknown, the Firefox (Tor Browser) spell checker is off by default for the subject lines of posts here.
If that could be fixed, it may improve forum quality! Though it may wreck the aforesaid heuristic.