Hi All,
This is not about scam projects. This is about the projects which fail to raise enough funds due to what so ever reasons. When bounty hunters work for weeks and at the last moment project announces that they can no longer run it due to insufficient funds raised, its nothing but a waste of time and energy for us.
In my opinion, should project teams have enough fundings before they look for investors? What is called MVP is very important for the users to check for before investing.
MVP will ensure that even if funds are not raised as expected, it can be delayed but not dead.
From your point of view, what other points are there which projects and investors both look for?
It is sad but we have to accept it because we all know that most of them are fail, so we have to choose the bounty more carefully. If teams have enough fundings before they look for investors, the bounty reward might be much lower and will you accpet it?
I think when the project had its own funds to develop their projects before seeking funding from investors I felt that the bounty reward that would be obtained was only in small amounts and we know that at this time it can be said that running the bounty is less promising if the project does not pay the hunters use btc or eth because we know that bounty hunters will not want to do something that is ultimately useless and they will certainly choose projects that dare to pay them using eth or btc.