Are you guys actually being serious? While I am really a person to support ANY possible scam attempt, that scam accusation is a complete joke and actually a desaster - sorry but thats my 2 cents even though I am still a very newbie in this forum.
I can see you are very newbie then

From the Trust Summary Page:
Positive - You think that this person is unlikely to scam anyone.
Neutral - Other comments.
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk.
He is just saying that trading with this person is high-risk of losing money. He is correct, because they refuse to escrow, and that doesn't make any sense.
If they are willing to pay, why can't they pay upfront to a trusted escrow as they have no reputation? Actually, they have a BAD reputation.
Something "right" is clearly wrong here. If they want to advertise here, that is not the proper way.
If they are refusing to use escrow, there are 2 options:
1 - they are scammers and will never pay
2 - they are newbies, and newbies don't know what they are doing, so you may still not receive your money.
They refused to use escrow so they are untrustworthy. There is no two ways about it, why should we trust them and let them have the opportunity to not pay? What on earth gives them immediate credibility here?
Nothing at all wrong with us requesting they use escrow, more importantly why are they not willing to use escrow?
Why should they pay someone when they have in-house staff to be in charge of it?
Because I don't trust their in-house staff, I don't trust their house, I don't trust their staff, and I don't care about them. I don't want to trust them, I don't want to care about them, and I don't give a shit about them. I just want my money trusting the fewer people as possible. I know I need to trust someone, so I prefer to trust a trusted escrow than to trust an unknown exchange. This is how things works here.