This is growing into an excellent discussion. Although I do have much more to say here, Ive recently been happy to step back and watch people examine the issue from different angles.
Because of how merit is sometimes perceived, I must note, I did not agree with, or fully agree with, every post I recently merited. Some raised meritorious, albeit (in my opinion) arguable points that I encourage others to examine. Some good dialectics are organically picking up here; and I want to encourage
intelligent, constructive discourse, as a necessary but insufficient precursor for action.
Speaking of which...-> Sadly all those content gets deleted here

Yup. :)
Archived and then disposed of, per what I said before:
If you want to post a statement that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto
cryptographically signed by one of Satoshis known keys, then please feel free. I wont delete it; indeed, I would be very interested to see that.
If you want to contradict my OP, try intelligently explaining why identity theft isnt identity theft. Thus far, your posts have been irrelevant to OP.
If you continue to support
identity theft with proof-by-repetition of arrant nonsense that has been exhaustively debunked all over the Internet, then you are not being honest toward Satoshi; and you may thus continue to find that I am in a bad mood, as I warned in OP.
[...]
Edit 2020-01-16: Sent two more of hv_s irrelevant and/or dishonest and insulting posts to /dev/null.
Archive of second page with both posts. Time to empty the bitbucket.