Question to those, who tagged red user
Best_ChangeDo BestChange bounty campaign participants risk to be tagged red? If they don't make payment to participants, then they are tagged for reason and it turns out that participants were promoting scam.
I've made an application post to participate in social media bounty campaign before BestChange was tagged. What should I do now? Do the tasks or not? What will happen if I made weekly report ?
Because right now everything is turning into 1) do the tasks = risk of being accused of promoting scam = red tag 2) don't do the tasks = not receiving payment / possibility to be kicked from campaign.
The whole situation turns to be a "lose-lose" situation for participants...
You should just do what you think is right, use your own due intelligence about it. If you think that that BestChange would pay you than why not participate ? It's your own risk.
I don't think you would be tagged for taking part in there campaign and promoting it, even if someone does it would be deemed as wrong use of trust system overall.
-snip-
Completely agree with
1miau, If this is the criteria with which tags are being given out then why don't we head over to the altcoin bounty section too and tag each and every campaign that is being run and is not using any trusted escrow, because they are "untrustworthy and we are trying to protect forum members", right?
Exactly, there are tons of projects running campaigns on bitcointalk without any escorw, just tagging one in
red would not go universal around. Although using a neutral trust would do the same effect.