Again this, again hypocrisy[1]. Users who advocated against me for less-numerical cases of improper ratings are advocating neutrals or ignore. This is why this is turning into a joke, and some actual neutrals are getting sucked into it without even noticing their downfall (evil tends to corrupt and drag down everything and anything it can with it) and the damage that has been and will be inflicted as a consequence of this.
I voted negative, because he is not trustworthy and I will tag him again now. This is
proper use of the fucking system, it
even always has been. It has been in the old, more stricter trust system and it is in the current more lenient one and with lenient I mean the requirements for a negative
are much more lenient than before. Have your brains turned into baboon poop? Note:
I do like baboons regardless.
[1] hacker1001101001 & co. has been noted in this particular instance.
I'll be removing off topic replies from this point.
Please continually archive this thread as you remove replies because above.
Nullius, regardless your sarcasm, I have temper and I have that crazy Balkan mentality I don't suck balls like some people around here and I don't apologize for jokes no matter how hard "you" (scare quote) think they are and I definitely won't apologize for this. I am pretty damn much honest, when I said it was a joke it was a joke. It was a fucking joke FFS.
This is actually the worst thing you could do for yourself and for everyone else. Giving in to users like him only
empowers them. So for fork sake: Do not apologize for any joke and ignore suggestions of this kind.
This has probably way crossed Type-1 flag requirements, but I'd have to check in with theymos to double check.