Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft [re: Craig Wright scam]
by
aoluain
on 19/01/2020, 08:47:18 UTC
I pretty much agree with you @aoluain and @JayJuanGee... There are somethings tho which I can't wrap my head around... Most of these people who support CSW claim he has the credentials for being Satoshi but what I fail to understand is why didn't he reveal himself right at the inception? Surely his credentials would have given the bitcoin's community a sense of stability. Why would a person who was so deeply focused on his privacy all of sudden want to give it away?... The Math doesn't add up to me at least... Imagine if someone published the general relativity theory anonymously and once it was proven correct, Einstein came forward to claim it was all him all along. It would appear it was him as he has the credentials but there would have been no way to verify his claims. But we all know Einstein stood by his theory and was proven just recently. I mean if CSW truly believed in his "Idea" why didn't he stick with it? Put your credentials on the line from the right go why hide behind an Alias... Thoughts like these will never make me believe CSW is Satoshi.

Quote from: nullius
OK.  If so, I hope he has fun.  Because that’s all he could get.  He doesn’t have the resources to “pull off” the attack:  Nobody does, and I am much more sure that he will not “get lucky” than I am sure I will not be killed by a flying fire hydrant today.

I will trust your judgement on that @nullius as I clearly lack the technical knowledge of ACISs and cryptography.

Satoshi was a true visionary, firstly to create Bitcoin, bring it to reality
[with the help of others] and then at an opportune moment step out
of the activity and dissapear knowing that to do so was the correct
action to take while the project is at a secure stage with the right
people guiding it.

The visionary thinking applys to the pseudonym "Satoshi Nakamoto"
if you plan on abandoning your project and leaving it to others you
cannot use your own name, He/She/They knew as early as possibly
2007 and certainly early 2008 that Bitcoin would create major disruption.

Quote

Mike Hearn - February 25, 2013, 12:48:54 PM

He communicated with a few of the core developers before leaving.
He told myself and Gavin that he had moved on to other things and
that the project was in good hands.

CSW on the other hand cares little for the Bitcoin project, and doesnt
care about the potential damage he is causing to Bitcoin, and the
credability to himself and the embarrasment to his family, not to mention
the stress to the Kleiman family and others.

Satoshi would never create a rival technology to Bitcoin and have the
nerve to call it Bitcoin SV.

CSW has shown to lack the class of Satoshi.