Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: IS GIVING RED-TRUST THAT NON-EXPLANATORY ?
by
JollyGood
on 20/01/2020, 17:43:00 UTC
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
Today I got a navigate trust rating for sending merits to a post I found informative...yes read again sending merits, and it was by someone who has lots of inclusions from well-known members here.


Quote
Lauda   2019-12-29   Reference   Maliciously merits what he/she knows to be a lie in order to propagate it and cause harm to me. Wouldn't trust as far as I could throw them, now should anyone trust a word they say.


Mine is not the only example, many users are just buried under this type of trust abuse.


I would like to get the community opinions on "if such type of usage of red trust should be acceptable and is it being that non-explanatory for the sender useful for the community overall".


The red tag in your profile currently shows:

Lying, malicious attempt at perpetuating slander, account farming, trading, ICO bumping, where does it end with this user?
Do not trust this user with anything financially, nor anything that is written by this user as he clearly writes whatever the payee pays to be written



Among various things I read allegations of:

- you having alt-accounts
- you being a paid shill willing to post anything for anyone
- you being involved with account farming
- you pumping ICOs
- you being a liar
- you being untrustworthy


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1021758
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53487964#msg53487964

Which of those allegations are you actually contesting?