Have a scroll back through some of my previous trust/feedback wall posts. I've compared word use in the past and been slapped with "crazy ideas" labels.
Nice to see someone else using the same principal.
I guess the acceptance of this kind of evidence depends on who is being accused, however it could also be a case of the OP not agreeing with:
political stance (both hard right Republicans)
Also, this is not all my own work, as some of this evidence was provided to me by various sources who wish to remain unaccredited for the time being.
I will say up front that Suchmoon has been making innuendoes of the underlying connection for months. I also have good reason to believe he has been trying to get some people who are active in handing out tags to notice this connection "on their own". This leads me to believe the evidence is not strong (see OP), or has the potential to reflect poorly on Suchmoon for some reason.
Some of the examples in the OP reflect proper English usage, and as
figmentofmyass mentioned, indicate bad faith by the OP (or maybe Suchmoon, I don't know).
I like to read the forum from my phone, and will sometimes post from my phone. When I post, I will often accept predictive text that my phone suggests. I have noticed that many forum users go to extremes to 'secure' their forum accounts, including not using their phones, so maybe the chances of two forum users making the specific mistakes are small, but this question would be invalid because the population of forum users includes a small population users who post from their smart phones that may have caused the mistakes in the OP (when they are actually mistakes). A scientifically valid experiment would need to control for input device if the input device (aka keyboard, or phone) may play a role in the errors. Further, there may be other small groups of distinct forum users who make other specific spelling errors.
I would ask the OP if he (or Suchmoon) can cite any scientific research that validates the use of common spelling errors to identify common authorship? If so, the research would be, at best, mixed on the subject.