that's a point of contention for me. if some combination of expressions is more common in general internet usage but less common on bitcointalk in relative terms, anomalies will appear more severe in your data than they should and the likelihood of coincidence increases.
"passphrase" is about as Bitcoin-ish as it gets. The correct spelling has been used by ~7000 users on this forum.
and what does that prove?
It disproves your statement about expressions common in general usage and less common on bitcointalk. I mean literally the paragraph I replied to.
you're the one making a claim, not me. it's incumbent on you to state what your claim is, to present your evidence, and---since it's not clear what your evidence proves---to qualify it.
i asked you to qualify your numbers. what exactly do they prove? you keep implying they prove that PrimeNumber7 = Quickseller, but that isn't clear.
i'm at a loss for what "numbers" i could provide since i am not making any claim. expecting people to "prove the negative" here is very unreasonable. the burden is on you and nutildah to prove this connection beyond a doubt.
You made the claim that it's "likely" (or "somewhat likely" or whatever it was) for the usage of those words/phrases to be a coincidence. I take it you no longer claim that. On the flip side, neither myself nor nutildah ever aimed to prove something "beyond a doubt". You're welcome to have any doubts you want.