Unfortunately, its also possible to understand the exchanger, because if the funds were indeed obtained illegitimately, they will be held responsible for helping fraudsters/drug dealers or the like.
On the other hand, the exchanger has not yet provided any serious evidence for their suspicions, just their subjective opinion.
Our moderator temporarily switched off the exchanger after they stopped responding to his requests, and not because of the current situation. The way the monitor works, after the punishment term expires, the exchanger gets automatically switched on. The theories about kickbacks shared in the original topic are very interesting and under other circumstances we would even discus them, but unfortunately these guesses have nothing to do with reality and only distract attention from this current situation.
We do not have the habit (neither the authority) to hastily call others scams or fraudsters, but try to get to the bottom of the situation, listen to different viewpoints and gather facts. We believe that this approach is more competent, although many users would prefer to point a finger and put the blame on somebody (including us), judging solely on their speculations.
Thats a logical conflict, dont you think?
It turns out that you are spreading subjective speculations about us being a fraud, based only on a fact that administration of the exchanger listed also subjectively thinks that the user is a fraud.
We would like to empathize that the users participating in our advertising campaign and being paid for it, have nothing to do with this incident.
In any case, given that there is no request from the law-enforcing authorities or real proof from the exchanger, we continue to insist they return the full amount to the user. Today we have switched the exchanger off until this situation is solved, their investigation is dragging on and they do not provide any new facts.