In principle, it is irrefutable. There is a difference between theory and practice. The full disclosure of malicious intent is sufficient to warrant a negative feedback.
Your reference link points to this thread, which shows JollyGood explaining their justification for red-trusting you. "Malicious intent" seems to be an excuse for your itch to retaliate.
Based on past observations, I don't expect a petty spiteful manipulator like you to understand the intricacies of ontology, but I hope you can at least use your energies to improve your intellectual faculties a bit for the well being of this forum, as theymos seems to so far have placed an inexplicably high amount of trust in you...
That's news to me and probably to theymos.
Now here's what you could do for the good of the forum: stop using red trust as your personal blog about people you disagree with.