Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Can someone translate this post to english:
doğru bir yaklaşım, umarım kazanır, Kalemder foruma düzenli katkılarının yanında bir de sanat yarışmasında olağanüstü emek gösterdi,
Meta'daki türlü entrikalara rağmen de çok erdemli duruş sergiledi, haklı bir seçim olur.
?Meta'daki türlü entrikalara rağmen de çok erdemli duruş sergiledi, haklı bir seçim olur.
These guys are classing up the Chipmixer campaign in a hurry:
Hayırdır din forumu mu burası? Nereye nasıl yazacağımı senden mi öğreneceğim? Translate konusunda iyisin bunu da tercüme et oku, sonra da kendi işine bak yalamaya devam et.
You are on to something suchmoon but there is an obvious contradiction in what Vispilio writes because in one place he accuses/alludes to Chipmixer being nothing more than a scam (which is what Yobit is) and on the other hand he asks to join the Chipmixer campaign:
No matter what one's moral views are, a BTT user should not be penalized for promoting one of the most well known crypto exchanges.
Many crypto exchanges are engaging in unethical practices like fake volume, pump & dump schemes, shitcoin IEO's, etc. and yet they are still highly popular because they also manage to fulfill some really valuable duties like market efficiency and liquidity.
As numerous users have already noted, an analogy can be drawn between promoting Chipmixer and Yobit's InvestBox:
you can choose to be a smart investor and use Investbox to make 0.1% on your BTC monthly without ever investing in any of the shit coins, or you may choose to be a gambler and pursue some short term wild gains in the massively inflated shitcoins (similarly Chipmixer service can be used for illicit activites, yet the marketer cannot and should not be held accountable for a potential abuse of a service that has other net benefits to the ecosystem)...
I agree the wording of the signature can be revised to be more honest, but trying to frame hundreds of Cryptotalk / Yobit participants would be one of the most harmful things this forum can do to herself and its user base...
Many crypto exchanges are engaging in unethical practices like fake volume, pump & dump schemes, shitcoin IEO's, etc. and yet they are still highly popular because they also manage to fulfill some really valuable duties like market efficiency and liquidity.
As numerous users have already noted, an analogy can be drawn between promoting Chipmixer and Yobit's InvestBox:
you can choose to be a smart investor and use Investbox to make 0.1% on your BTC monthly without ever investing in any of the shit coins, or you may choose to be a gambler and pursue some short term wild gains in the massively inflated shitcoins (similarly Chipmixer service can be used for illicit activites, yet the marketer cannot and should not be held accountable for a potential abuse of a service that has other net benefits to the ecosystem)...
I agree the wording of the signature can be revised to be more honest, but trying to frame hundreds of Cryptotalk / Yobit participants would be one of the most harmful things this forum can do to herself and its user base...
User name: Vispilio
Post count: 2525
BTC Address (Segwit): bc1qjpms8lghlmd5at6h3h72udgy3elznt9gd32zgx
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with Chipmixer's dictum that more local board presence for this campaign will be excellent
Best
Post count: 2525
BTC Address (Segwit): bc1qjpms8lghlmd5at6h3h72udgy3elznt9gd32zgx
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with Chipmixer's dictum that more local board presence for this campaign will be excellent
Best
It is clear that those duplicitous traits are not enough to ask whether he deserves to be DT ranked or not but what cannot be ignored is his promoting of a banner he himself calls a scam. No user, especially a DT ranked should be able to do that.