⭐ Merited by eddie13 (1)
Of course you are, and in the process just skipping the part where you prove your prerequisite claim:
Prior accusations:The accusation was floating around for a long time and PN7 got red tagged before this thread even existed.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215097.msg53538429#msg53538429
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195337.msg52912409#msg52912409
are there prior accusations from before you tagged PrimeNumber7 in july 2019?
The primary purpose of the trust system is to protect the community. Your use of it is an implicit claim of doing so with your action.
So you're protecting the community by including PrimeNumber7 in your trust list?I feel safer already, thanks.
while PrimeNumber7 doesn't presently have particularly valuable feedback or trust list, i'm beginning to see the value in including users from both sides of any "forum drama", if not generally issuing counter feedback. or at least tempering my trust list to account for how DT is actually used.
it's obvious that trust feedback (including DT) is generally used to facilitate personal vendettas and forum politics, not to mention that proof is optional. as TECSHARE pointed out, there are doxxers and plenty of legally/morally questionable behavior whichever side of the divide (DT and its detractors) you look at, so DT itself is not an accurate gauge for what is acceptable behavior on this forum. those who were around during quickseller's heyday know that he likely could have easily redeemed himself and retained his DT status in 2015 had he simply kneeled at the time instead of doubling down on his scoundrel behavior and digging himself deeper and deeper. (as we know quickseller tends to do)
i think all of this is fairly obvious to anyone who knows the facts and has a brain. very few people are willing to call it out or accept their role in perpetuating it though. props to TECSHARE and mikeywith for having the balls not to toe the party line. some other people ITT just depress the fuck outta me.
