~snip~
No one will say that it is not OK to tag someone just because they are in signature campaign, but obviously doesn't work in all scenarios.
Vispilio tried to troll but in the "real life", if you pull "yeah, it is pyramid scam" and you still decide to advertise it, and you get caught, you will be fined. For example, in my country, if you knowingly advertise financial pyramid scam, which is what you agreed to advertise when you took that signature and said they run pyramid scam, you can get up to 3 years in jail.
Strong "opinions" and "free speech" can be very dangerous. Teaching people that it is ok to advertise scam because it is not your business if someone can't recognize scam is scammy behavior itself.
I think some users might direct you to the rules of the forum rather than the real world with its various jurisdictions but keeping with the essence of your post it is absolutely not acceptable for anybody to advertise a scam and then resolve themselves of all responsibility attached to it and shift it on the end user or victim if they have been gullible enough to fall for the scam.
It seems the community came to the general consensus that yobit is not too much of a scam for it to be advertised on the forum right?
I don't like that they were allowed to come back and advertise after being banned for it but the community allowed it..
Small correction: Yobit's signature was never banned for being a scam, it was banned for spamming the forum.
It is good to know Yobit was previously banned here in the forum for effectively flooding/spamming rather any other reason. I could be wrong but it looks like when they were given permission to return they tried their best to drive traffic to their own cryptotalk forum and use it as a competitor to this forum (and also just in case they got banned again) but if that was the case they failed in making any dents here.