Quote from: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 01:40:15 PM

I have removed their previous negative while I look into the current state of events (which are unrelated to why the negative was given). Do note that I was being threatened with a flag[1] unless I comply, not that this was the reason for complying.
~snip~

[1] I don't see how someone has a "right to give a flag" if I don't comply with a rating review in time.
Publicized PM because cases are on-going and I don't want to keep this in my box.

I'm kinda shocked you gave a shit about them creating a flag, especially one without basis. In no way is you leaving them negative feedback something that warrants a Flag against you as it doesn't mean people are at risk of losing money in dealing with you. While I don't agree universally with your use of the trust/feedback system, you in no way should be pushed into performing reviews based on the timeline of others.
Not that it matters at the moment but to me that earned them an exclusion, same as anyone I come across with an inherent failure to use the system as I think it's meant to be. They shouldn't be threatening as a courtesy and should have just left a neutral expressing their opinions.
I revised my neutral for the time being but will see what happens and whether or not they will continue to claim 100% reliable and legal, on the bestchange.com site, while indemnifying themselves from liability at the same time.

Quote from: webtricks on January 23, 2020, 03:59:00 PM

Actually they are confusing flag with trust rating. By giving flag, they surely meant giving red trust if red trust for not paying campaign participants isn't removed.

This is a misuse of the feedback system as well. Retaliatory feedback is not acceptable.