The only one jumping around is you in a desperate attempt to topic slide and hope people will be distracted from what I am bringing attention to, that you are so far the first one documented to have made the accusation as you pretend it originated elsewhere. More NO U eh?
Why is it so important to identify who was the first documented accuser? So far at least five members have come forward and claimed to have independently arrived at the same conclusions, all around the same time. Why is that so hard to accept?
I've said it before; the evidence is all circumstantial, but in combination an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence can be compelling. If you disagree, debunk the evidence. Don't attempt to deflect, and levy an accusation on the person(s) presenting the evidence. I know you've had long running disputes with both nutildah and suchmoon, but it is possible for them to right from time to time, even if you think they are wrong most of the time.
Why is it so important to tie these two accounts together? What crimes exactly is this preventing? This is about nothing but petty interpersonal disputes, and the fact that Suchmoon can't document any earlier claims after trying to pretend it wasn't them just solidifies this fact. I like the touch of "NO U" you added as well. Very slick.