Re: 🔥 Vile Chipmixer Bounty Abuse 🔥 Probably the Biggest Con Job on Bitcointalk
Even going by the bare minimum statistics, Turkish boards should have already had at least 2 members representing Chipmixer, before Darkstar_ was begrudgingly convinced that it would be the "politically correct" strategic move to include one...
Sit back and relax and think for yourself, is it not excessive when there are users here wanting to have a dedicated board while we only have 20 local boards and one skandinavisk local board which includes users from Sweden, Norway and Denmark and we have 195 countries and here you are trolling about the unconstitutional selection procedure in a campaign that only one Turk is selected in the campaign 
.Chill out mate have fun once in a while rather than taking things personally
.You must have a PhD in geography
, but it goes a little bit deeper than that, of the 195 countries you mention, Turkish section ranks at number 3 and gaining fast on number 2 on local boards in hits and engagement,and this despite the fact that most people access this forum via VPN in Turkei because it's banned by the primary Internet provider...
Imagine the level of crypto enthusiasm originating from Turkish sources then, and decide for yourself whether it's a good business decision to include some Turkish members on a mixer campaign,
so unlike what the experienced schemers will keep telling you, the rational move here is to question the judgement and motives of at least the campaign manager,
who, if I'm not mistaken, also wears the hat of forum treasurer, which poses a conflict of interest for a number of political reasons...