and then he collaborated with nutildah to produce the evidence in this thread. read the OP to the end,
this post, etc.
So what if they collaborated? Is it only a valid accusation if no collaboration took place?
FYI my issue is also with you, nutildah, and anyone else defending the practice of using threads like this (full of unproven accusations) to publicly disgrace people. my concern is this forum's embarrassing and fucked up brand of mob justice, not suchmoon specifically. (although i will say his self-righteousness and intellectual dishonesty are infuriating)
I see, your issue isn't with the "unproven accusations" but rather with the people presenting them. Got it, you don't like nutildah, suchmoon, or me. Now that we've got that cleared up, debunk the the evidence, please?
i was merely implying that your and my opinion on this subject was reasonable. as opposed to some other people....
I don't know what gave you the impression that I can't be reasonable, or that our's that is the "reasonable" opinion, for that matter. It's just an opinion, after all, which is subjective. But I must ask; how reasonable is it to attack the messenger, and not the underlying issue?
The people defending Quickseller just look like a bunch of corrupted defense lawyers who've had one too many mimosas.
If you take a gander at the last couple of pages you'll see; this isn't about defending Quickseller, it's not about what's right or wrong, it's not about protecting the forum from
proven scammers making their way to DT. It's about attacking the accusers, because of who the accusers happen to be in this case.
Look at these arguments; they're all over the place, jumping from one inane comment to another, none of which really address the root of the issue. They only focus on the individuals involved, not the evidence. The longer this thread goes the more it will devolve into bickering and meaningless interpersonal squabbles.