What if this draft is some type of ploy that Karpeles released to make it look like a third party is involved for a potential purchase. This explains why it was knowledgeable yet poorly written. Maybe he is actually planning to sell the functional Mt Gox assets to a company that he owns in a different jurisdiction for pennies (so he can back out of the liability and start fresh) then install a figurehead or partner to run the new 'Gox' while he silently owns shares in the background through a nominee shareholder. He can then train the new CEO, etc.
Maybe that's their plan.....and they released the 'leak' draft on purpose. Conspiratorial but very possible.
Please give me a little street cred and humor me before you start dismissing this outright. I've been correct up until this point (see below).