Your meaning is unclear: Are you saying that the cold, hard maths that make Yobits advertised rates of return impossible are an opinion, or that it is only an opinion that the promise of impossible returns is a textbook, definitional scam?
This. I see a lot of posts saying that the clear facts I presented in my previous posts (
here,
here, and
here) are just like, my opinion, man, but no one has refuted a single one of them.
Some of us obviously agree to disagree about the signature being worthy of a tag.
That proves it's an opinion and not a fact.
Some people disagree that the Earth is round. That doesn't make it any less of a fact.
Is anyone actually arguing that X10 isn't a scam? Or are we just arguing whether knowingly promoting a proven scam is untrustworthy behavior?
You're missing the argument again.
No one here is arguing YoBit isn't a scam.
Some people disagree that the Earth is round. That doesn't make it any less of a fact.
Dis/Agreement and facts are not the same.
ISS pictures, lunar eclipses, sunsets, time zones are proving the round Earth a fact.
Agreeing or disagreeing changes nothing. Just like trades.
The same is with the nutildahs posted malware. If the file is ran through virustotal and comes up as a virus on 10/10 AVs, it's no longer an opinion that it's malware.
If someone denies a 1000
BTC withdrawal, and it can be verified, it becomes fact that they damaged their users.
If a user wears a signature in order to earn some m
BTC he didn't scam anyone.
There is no proof in him damaging any users at all.
It is purely your opinion that him participating in a signature campaign can be potentially harmful.
Or are we just arguing whether knowingly promoting a proven scam is untrustworthy behavior?
Keyword is knowingly.
As I said, I would not have worn the signature had I read more about it.
But you can see why I see this as potentially harmful.