Most have probably never encountered threads about this website at all. Nor did they know how YoBit operates or what an InvestBox was.
Where do you draw the line? If the campaign puts a malware link into the signature, is that still ok? If the signature campaign asks you to post in the Yobit thread, is that still ok?
BTW there was a lively debate about X10 in the signature campaign thread. That's where Yobit requested to change the signature, that's where yahoo said he was going to ask for a change, etc. If you're that ignorant then you probably shouldn't be in a signature campaign to begin with.
You draw the line where guilt via association and arbitrary enforcement is not used. All of the scenarios you posted are talking about direct involvement, not guilt via association just for wearing a banner you and your mob buddies are obsessing over. Once again, none of your obsessive mobbing and tagging changes anything, it is exclusively punitive compulsive behavior to punish users and stops Yobit itself in no way.
nullius 2020-01-28
Counter to counters by figmentofmyass, BayAreaCoins, and eddie13. What, is this some schoolyard game? NO BACKSIES! The feedback provided by by Lauda, Vod, and marlboroza is factually based, and a necessary warning to anybody who is trying to understand TECSHAREs persistent crusade to protect forum abusers, attack people who stop forum abuse, manipulate DT voting, and otherwise undermine the trust system. Like I said, you are operating on guilt via association. Now instead of just tagging people who are associated with Yobit, you are tagging people who are arguing against tagging people associated with Yobit, because clearly if they disagree with you they deserved to be tagged too. This is exactly the reason this shouldn't be happening, because this guilt via association excuse is EVER EXPANDING and has no clear line where it begins or stops.
~nullius