I will however question why there is no pressure on yahoo to stop managing the campaign
I'm pretty sure there was pressure put on him to stop managing it--but as of right now the campaign is closed anyway if I'm not mistaken, so no more pressure need be applied. I'm actually glad Yobit decided to end it before this issue blew up more than it needed to.
I've had mixed feelings about members getting tagged because of what they're advertising in their signature space and with this Yobit thing I've been going back and forth in my mind as to whether there's an actual Ponzi scheme going on with the investbox--and yes, I've read posts made by o_e_l_e_o and others about it and it's started to look and quack like a duck if you know what I mean.
I wouldn't be able to bring myself to tag Yahoo62278 anyway, even if he wore the Yobit signature. That would be based on his long history of trustworthiness and the little doubt in my mind that remains that Yobit is approaching full scammer status.
And I'm certainly not defending the manipulation which Yobit used to advertise their exchange.
Yeah, this has been a weird situation all around. They definitely were sneaky when they switched from the cryptotalk sig to the investbox one, and I'll bet a lot of people didn't even know what it was they were advertising exactly. Ah....it's making my head spin.