Here I am, standing on the sidelines, condemning my own (previously-referred to as) "gang members" together with one of my strongest opponents, eddie13, TECSHARE, Quickseller. I would have never thought such a situation would (or even could) come.
Doing the right thing against the flow of your peers is admirable..
@Lauda, @eddie13, I encourage you to explain why yahoo62278 deserves a red-tag
The argument I think you are referring to is not wither or not to tag yahoo.
The argument that you cannot tag Yobit participants, even though you probably think you should, but can't because then you would also have to tag your buddie yahoo, is the point..
The "They deserve to be tagged but not yahoo because I like him" line of though is hypocritical because it is basically protecting your own buddies while you would otherwise have tagged them to hell..
If any Yobit advertisers should be tagged for advertising Yobit, yahoo should be the FIRST to be tagged, not the last or not tagged because of whatever excuses..
The same should be applied to
all, and if anything, the most "reputable" users should be held to the highest standards, not excused from them..
My point is/was that if anyone should have been tagged for advertising Yobit (other than the X10ers), they should all be tagged
equally including yahoo..
No preferential treatment.. You shouldn't tag someone you don't like while excusing your friend of the same actions..