Please note the extreme lack of merits on very substantive posts from everyone against Yahoo (eddie, et. al. and me).
I'm used to it..
I get a share of merits here and there but I have found that posting dangerous opinions is definitely not the way to get merits from the usual sources, who don't want to be seen supporting or agreeing with said dangerous positions, no matter how high quality or high effort the posts are..
Widely agreeable posts get the merits.. Not minority opinions usually..
I'm now clear with this thread that if Justice needs to be done, either it should be done in full or nothing.
That either DTs tag Yahoo if they are intended towards tagging the users who advertised Yobit in their signatures or none should be tagged.
EXACTLY my point this entire time..
I'll review the situation pertaining my future actions on the next update on Loyce's website. Another problem are people who do not act (e.g. remove inclusions), further giving credibility to these shady/scammy practices and creating a platform of support. In the same time, you can't tag these people or do anything because it isn't "proper use of the system" according to some. When all your systems fail you despite your potential actions being