The forum is not only for trading, you know. I myself have never yet traded with the public here; although I may someday, I did not originally come here for the purpose of making money! I came to the Bitcoin Forum founded by Satoshi, for the immediate purpose of engaging in technical discussions.
Ask theymos to remove the word "trading" from the description of red trust and I'll reconsider my POV. Until then your use of negative trust indicates to me that you're either misusing it or that your judgement is flawed if you truly think that TECSHARE is high-risk in trading.
If that is a concise statement of your opinion, then please feel free to ~nulliusjust be sure to ~ everybody else who issues any positive or negative feedback for any reason not meeting your
extremely narrow standard.
Starting with all makers of the feedback that I was supporting.
Further discussion is unwarranted, when I have clearly stated the conditions for my removal of my counter:
Because it explicitly is a counter, I will remove my counter if figmentofmyass, eddie13, and BayAreaCoins all remove their positive countersand not otherwise. However, this will not stop the potential that now that I am examining TECSHARE, I may independently add my own negative feedback at some point; and such a thing would absolutely and unarguably stay put until either hell freezes over, or I mine a Bitcoin block on my Raspberry Pi. Perhaps longer.
If your extremely narrow trading-forum trust feedback standard is harmful to the rest of the forum, I suggest that that's a bad custom for the rest of the forum-
Whats next? Bringing back Risked BTC amount? And/or limiting negative trust feedback to violations of a written contract? Well, that is why we now have Type-3 flags.
Come on now. I know you're smarter than that. Let's not insult each other's intelligence by resorting to fallacies.
is not a fallacy. To the contrary.
Now please, lets not insult each others intelligence with I know youre smarter than that backhanded compliments.
Anything else I could say to your latest post would be a rehash of what I have already said.