Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Are the negative trusts you have given so far really necessary?
by
TECSHARE
on 30/01/2020, 09:20:05 UTC
Incorrect. The first interaction I ever had with you was in Meta (feel free to prove me wrong if you'd like). I think our first disagreement (and one of the reasons I decided to add you to my distrust list) was because of your overall approach to the trust system. Then a few replies later you posted a lengthy meme about what the trust system meant to you. That may be the one I was thinking of; regardless, I felt your reply was overly pompous while simultaneously unclear, and it was then that I knew I didn't agree with your judgment.

Only after a couple of months of interacting with you did I realize you were always displeased and arrogant about everything, and in our first interaction you were only exhibiting your natural demeanor.

Our first direct interaction was here. What a coincidence 6 hours before you injected yourself into my conversation with another user there, I posted a thread about the attacks and threats on the Covington kids in Politics & Society. This was a thread you were clearly aware of as you later posted in it with clear disdain for even acknowledging death threats against children as being a serious topic of discussion just because they happen to be Trump supporters. I am sure it is just a coincidence...

BTW, where was the part about Morpheus, I was looking forward to that part of your narrative. I don't see anything wrong with my comments in meta you replied to, and clearly others found it productive. As I implied earlier, I think you have some serious issues with projecting upon people who have different political view points than you, and your little Morpheus fairy tale and accusations of "going nuts" being "pompous" and "unclear" demonstrate that. Clearly you just have trouble tolerating people having ideas other than what you approve of as evidenced by your attempts to manufacture baseless narratives about me in order to impugn my character.