...
So if I throw darts and randomly hit a bulls eye, am I awesome?
I can draw a plotted line too and say something may happen during that time. If it does will I be awesome?
As you said, he has been wrong many times and we gets its right, he is awesome?
Let's call a spade a spade:
DanB1's type of reasoning is what an ordinary person would call "corrupt".
With the added twist of course that what CaymanJack says about the randomness of it is absolutely true, plus that the market movement we see is too small to be outside of the margin of noise. It is not even a small correction. We are less than 3% from the high. So now let's see whether we can decline another 30% from here. So far it's a joke.
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog
starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog