Which was in response to:
How is that "forcing private information to be public"? All I'm saying is that in my opinion the red tag on Kalemder has no basis. If you think "trust me, I have evidence" is a valid reason for red trust in this case - feel free to add nullius and Lauda to all your trust lists.
she is right about the rating (not about the forcing private information to be public)
Where did I force "private information to be public"?
Making a claim based on information he refuses to disclose is ridiculous..
As if we are supposed to trust nullius to be some sort of secret agent man with a security clearance where we should trust his claims without seeing the "sensitive" information ourselves because he is the only one good enough to see it..
If he wants everyone to agree with and support his tags he needs to produce this secret evidence because it does not stand on his questionable word alone..
i.e. Kalemder