In Ponzi, the payment is possible only from funds of other investors. In bitcoin also. And that's the point.
In ALL TRANSACTIONS, payment is only possible from funds of someone else paying you. That's the DEFINITION OF A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION.
You seem to like to say:
"Look, someone paid someone, in a Ponzi people pay people, therefore it is a Ponzi!"
Then when someone points out that there are lots of reasons that people pay people, and that they are not all Ponzi, you respond with:
"Those examples are beside the point. In those examples, someone paid someone and since they were paid it's ok. But in Bitcoin someone pays someone, and in Ponzi someone pays someone, therefore Bitcoin is a Ponzi!"
It's circular nonsense that carries no meaning. Yes, in a scam, a person is convinced to give another person something of value. That is NOT what makes it a scam. People give other people things of value all the time in situations that are not a scam. Until you can understand this, you aren't going to get anywhere in this conversation.
What matters is that its holders are not paid by the issuers
One cannot be paid by someone that does not exist. What matters is that holders should not expect to be paid by anyone for holding. It is not an "investment" into a business. It does not pay "dividends" or "interest". It is inflationary money that will eventually become deflationary.
like in all legitimate investments, but by other bitcoin investors, like in Ponzi schemes.
There you go saying words again that don't make sense, and that are contradictory.