This.
Tend to agree about this matter. Once a company/projects that didn't build a reputation yet, you can't trust them by submitting a copy of any one of the following documents as proof of identity. As much as possible huwag nalang talaga tayong sasali sa mga ICO/IEO's, Airdrop or any token sales that required KYC because they are not capable to handle and keep our personal identities safe. Although in other aspects KYC is had an advantage, I think it has no make sense to submit KYC TO those companies that we already trusted or had build reputation and operate over a year of existence. Tulad nalang ng country of China they are not allowed to take part in any ICOs/IEO's, also Indonesia and the US as well. They know that usually, they are asking KYC/AML verification.

It's a very informative thread, sa mga pahayag mo ay nagnanais na ang KYC is not necessary but IMO, there are pros and cons in having KYC. It can also reduce money laundering and also stopping scammers from maliciously taking part in ICOs when it comes airdrop that they might abuse. Kung wala naman sigurong KYC kumakalat din ang mga abusers maliban sa scammers when it comes ICO's/IEO's participating.

Nasa atin pa rin ang huling decision to avoid those scammers, always remember the DYOR.