Nullius - myself and a couple others have substantiated the claims against Techy. The proof is in the reference link.
Techy chooses to either ignore or claim he does not understand. He does not have anyone who wants to help him. I don't think you will convince him of anything.
His next step will be to post a list of your supporters and extort them into untrusting you. In the interests of forgiveness, I will not lay this linked crime on his trust page, and allow him to edit/delete the post. Yes, I am a nice guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extortion#United_States
Techy chooses to either ignore or claim he does not understand. He does not have anyone who wants to help him. I don't think you will convince him of anything.
His next step will be to post a list of your supporters and extort them into untrusting you. In the interests of forgiveness, I will not lay this linked crime on his trust page, and allow him to edit/delete the post. Yes, I am a nice guy.
Quote
Extortion, which is not limited to the taking of property, involves the verbal or written instillation of fear that something will happen to the victim if they do not comply with the extortionist's will. Another key distinction is that extortion always involves a verbal or written threat,[1] whereas robbery may not. In United States federal law, extortion can be committed with or without the use of force an
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extortion#United_States
As predicted, you were preparing yet another accusation before even substantiating any of the previous ones. Thanks for the definition, that fits your posts perfectly.
That sure does sound a lot like an opinion. Rather arbitrary to make this accusation isn't it?
Techy, you have shared PMs without permission, right?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148016.msg51275111#msg51275111
Listed as a neutral on your profile. Do you think I should change it to red, hypocrite?
Ok, you've deflected this thread away from your trust abuse.
2020 will bring you a lot more red I think, no matter how upset you get.
2020 will bring you a lot more red I think, no matter how upset you get.
I caused no damages to Hhampuz. There was no explicit agreement to keep our PMs private. He was speaking as if I was presenting myself rudely privately to the public while we had a perfectly polite conversation that was of no other consequence than it being perfectly polite. There was no lie about it, and Hhampuz hasn't presented any grievance over the matter, you are simply latching on to it as an excuse to attempt to extort me into changing the negative rating which you very much deserve for the publicly documented doxing of OGNasty and claiming to report him to the IRS because you had a petty dispute with him.
Do you care to try to support any of the other claims you have made against me?
Vod 2020-02-04 Reference "Mentally ill stalker who will post private messages then lie about it as revenge for ignoring him. Avoid. "
Vod 2019-09-09 Reference "This profile has fundamentally abused the trust system, trading positive trust with as many others as possible to get on Default Trust. See reference and the BPIP DT Change Log for examples. Do not trust this profile's trust of others by adding ~TECSHARE to your personal trust list. "
Your second rating is merely a link to another accusation based on nothing more than spurious correlation, and creative writing skills.
Both you and Nullius are claiming that this accusation is substantiation. You are merely linking your accusation to another accusation that was itself never established.