Did I break the rules of this forum?
As I said in my post above, this kind of behavior breaks rules regarding spamming, low value or uninteresting threads, and unsubstantial advertising.
Just take a look at the number of views messages in the threads.
This is a useless metric, I'm afriad. You are posting on Bitcoin Discussion and Altcoin Discussion. These boards are some of the core posting areas of bounty spammers. Pretty much any thread will get views and replies. Take a look at some of the utterly trash topics which are getting hundreds of replies and thousands of views:
Example 1,
Example 2,
Example 3.
And that's why I don't understand why some of the topics have been deleted.
Because you are not using the forum for its intended purpose, which is to
discuss ideas. You are abusing the forum for free advertising for your site.
Anyway, if this forum is not the right place to share important content for the community I will stop doing this immediately.
I would hardly call a bunch of blog posts "important content".
I don't deem my threads a low value or uninteresting. But as far as I ain't the one who should decide I refer to your own metrics. And the metrics say that the community has proved my statement to be correct. And anyway, why is this thread is not popular, then?
You're right. I don't discuss things much but I provide the community with interesting topics to discuss, so I use the forum for its intended purpose, which is to discuss ideas.
My posting history is not perfect , but what I dont do is just repeat something Ive seen or heard and put on this forum .
I just checked your posting history. You did repeat something you've seen or heard and put on this forum. Nice catch, isn't it?
Imagine if everyone did the same thing you're doing on the forum. It would become home to a sh*tload of copied articles. Contribution to the forum is appreciated, what you're doing is not. This forum is no home to free ads.
So you're basically saying that it is better to promote casinos for payments than share exclusive content without being paid for it.
---
What I can see here is that a bunch of bounty hunters with paid signatures (20kevin20, o_e_l_e_o, suchmoon, hosseinimr93) accuses person who shares exclusive content without receiving any benefits for it. No offense but that's just too much.