I think he just overlooked the possibility that you were responding to my post in a thread I didn't post in.
Are you accusing him of lying about deleting your post? Seems unlikely to me, but this isn't the first time he has explicitly told you that he didn't delete a post from your "FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP" thread, and you seem to just not care.
If you think he's lying, call him out on it and maybe we can get to the bottom of it.
If you don't think he's lying, then remove the posts he says he didn't delete.
Or do nothing if you don't care if your accusations against FH are accurate or not.
I don't care what he did or says. A moderator deleted those posts
The ethical thing to do would be to change the title of the thread to "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: BITCOINTALK - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP" or ""REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: MODS - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP" or something like that instead of singling out a specific moderator who has denied deleting multiple posts you're accusing him of deleting.
Or accuse him of lying.
Thanks for the lecture in ethics. No.
You really think it's ok to blame FH for deleting posts he didn't delete, and use them of evidence that he is an unfair moderator?
I don't care what he did or says. A moderator deleted those posts
Really? The accusation isn't against 'moderators', it's against FH. You sure you don't care?